Skip to main content

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

🚀 V𝗶𝗯𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 — 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗺𝗲

Updated
1 min read
🚀 V𝗶𝗯𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 — 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗺𝗲
B
Curious developer, willing to learn and grow.

🚀 V𝗶𝗯𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 — 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗺𝗲

Everyone talks about vibe coding like it’s magic. “Just describe what you want… and AI builds it.”

Reality? It works—but only when your inputs are structured.

Here’s a simple trick that changed everything for me 👇

👉 I don’t directly ask AI to write code. 👉 𝗜 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝘀𝗸 𝗔𝗜 𝘁𝗼 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗽𝘁... 👉 and then I use that prompt to build.

Why this works:

AI thinks better when it frames the problem clearly You move from vague ideas → structured intent The output becomes way more consistent and usable

So instead of:

❌ “Build me a feature”

I do:

✅ “𝗪𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝗮 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗽𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗳𝗲𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁𝘀, 𝗶𝗻𝗽𝘂𝘁𝘀, 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗽𝘂𝘁𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝘀𝗲𝘀”

Then I reuse that prompt.

This one shift:

improved code quality reduced back-and-forth made vibe coding feel more like engineering, not guessing

Funny part?

I haven’t seen this mentioned in most vibe coding courses yet.

💡 My takeaway:

Vibe coding is not just about what you ask. It’s about 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝘀𝗸.

If you’re building with AI— try this once.

It might change how you code.

#VibeCoding #VsCode #ChatGPT #Gemini #PromptEngineering

7 views

Lazy Content Studio

Part 4 of 5

This series of post will showcase my progress on building a local-first AI content tool using FastAPI, Electron, and a local LLM — focusing on structured JSON output, zero infrastructure, and full developer control over SaaS AI tools. If you want it slightly shorter (more search-safe under 155 characters): Why I’m building a local-first AI tool with FastAPI and a local LLM — structured output, zero infrastructure, and full control beyond SaaS AI tools.

Up next

PromptOS - As a re-usable project component

A project component to help developer to use better contextual, prompt with predefined skills and rules.